The people of California have twice spent millions of dollars to confirm California citizens wanting
God's Biblical marriage and not sinful homosexuality. In addition Proposition 8 was unnecessary as California Family Code
297.5 already gave domestic partnerships equal rights, apart from the word marriage. So much money has been wasted and Arnold
Schwarzenegger has failed the people. However, in continued disobedience to God and the people of California, anti-family
homosexuals have sued Proposition 8 again and show no care for wasting money and ignoring the people in California.
Andy Pugno, general counsel for ProtectMarriage.com, released the following statement August 19th on behalf
of the official proponents of Prop. 8, in response to the hearing of Perry v Schwarzenegger et al in United States District
Court, Northern District of California:
"As the only party to Perry v Schwarzenegger that has consistently
fought to preserve Prop.8, we are pleased with Judge Walker's decision to deny intervenor status to [homosexual activist groups].
The motions for intervenor status clearly demonstrate the discord and disagreement that exists among [homosexual] activists
as they continue to run roughshod in their efforts to overturn the will of the people in regards to upholding traditional
marriage in California.
"While the City and County of San Francisco was granted its request to intervene
over the objections of the plaintiffs in the case, their participation will be limited to demonstrating any governmental impact
of Prop. 8.
"However we are concerned that this case could result in the plaintiffs attempting to put the
voters who supported Prop 8 on trial.
"We will vigorously resist the plaintiffs being allowed to conduct a
fishing expedition into the motives of those who support traditional marriage. We were pleased that opposing counsel promised
the court that they would attempt no discovery that violates the First Amendment rights of the proponents and the voters.
It is preposterous to think that the 7 million California voters who supported Proposition 8 were motivated out of bigotry
and discrimination. That is essentially the claim by the plaintiffs in this case. Prop 8 was always about restoring and reclaiming
the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a women and upholding the will of the people who had already overwhelmingly
voted in favor of traditional marriage.
"As this case proceeds to an expected trial in January we will work
diligently and faithfully to defend the rights of the people to put the traditional definition of marriage into our state
constitution."
>
Read Famous American History God and Bible QuotesSad News on Barack Obama
>
Obama and Clinton Betray Families> Sarah Palin Credited With Removing Obama's "Death Panels"> Americans Do Not Trust Obama> Opposition to Government Healthcare Rises> Clinton Confesses CFR Tells US Government What to Do> Obama Makes Anti-Family Census 
